Changes in funeral rituals during the Covid 19 Pandemic in Ecuador
Abstract
Nancy Scheper Hughes maintains that when a human being dies, his space, his place diez with him. Conversely, the space and the place that the individual inhabited lose the being who lived in those spaces and places.
To study the death of an individual, one must consider their history and socioeconmic conditions, the power they achieved in life, their symbolic system, their beliefs, and their cosmovision. In the case of physicians, their power, curiously, is based on how they confront the inevitability of death.
Los mortuarial rituals that all cultures practice serve to provide some meaning to death. When a person dies, a memory remains. This memory has little to do with how the person “actually” lived, Rather it is a tacit agreement among the living about how they wish to establish a memory of the deceased person.
But what happens in societies when these rituals are suspended? What happens when the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic and the closeness of death transform the equatorial people?
This reflection ponders the management of the human condition with regard to birth and death in western societies with an emphasis on the modern western medical model. The question under study focuses on describing how the high mortality and the suspensión of funeral rituals changed the culture and social relations in the mestizo world.
Downloads
References
2. Frankl, V. ( 1946). El hombre en busca de sentido. Barcelona, España: Herder, ISBN 978-84-254-3989-6.
3. Pausch, R. La ultima lectura Barcelona 2008
4. Meier, Ph.D., Jarred V. Gallegos, M.A., Lori P. Montross-Thomas, Ph.D., Colin A. Depp, Ph.D., Scott A. Irwin, M.D., Ph.D., Dilip V. Jeste, M.D. Defining a Good Death (Successful Dying): Literature Review and a Call for Research and Public Dialogue, 2016 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.
5. Hughes T, Schumacher M, Jacobs-Lawson JM, Arnold S. Confrontando la muerte: Percepciones de una buena muerte en adultos con cáncer de pulmón. Revista Americana de Hospicio y Medicina Paliativa®. 2008;25(1):39-44. doi:10.1177/1049909107307377.
6. Ezekiel J Emanuel, Linda L Emanuel,The promise of a good death, The Lancet, Volume 351, Supplement 2, 1998,Pages SII21-SII29,ISSN 0140-6736,https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)90329
7. Heidegger M. Ser y Tiempo Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria; 1997.
8. Lacan, J. Seminario 6. El deseo y su interpretación. Inédito.
9. Lacan, J. El Seminario. Libro 8. La transferencia. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 2003.
10. Real Academia Española, (1992). Diccionario de la lengua española. Madrid: Mateu- Cromo. Artes Gráficas
11. Lacan, J. El Seminario. Libro 10. La angustia. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 2006.
12. Comelles J. Tecnología, cultura y sociabilidad. Los límites culturales del hospital contemporáneo. In Medicina y cultura. Estudios entre la Medicina y la Antropología. Barcelona: Edicions Bellaterra; 2000.
13. Boer M. Planteos éticos de la práctica de la medicina en pacientes pediátricos con pronóstico reservado. Sus familiares y la búsqueda de alternativas terapéuticas. Rev. Hosp. Italiano. 2008; 28(2).
14. Avalos M. la Salud-Enfermedad y Muerte desde un abordaje Etnográfico. Misiones-Argentina. Revista Urguaya Antropológia. 2018; 3(1).
15. Augé M. Las formas del olvido Barcelona: Gedisa; 1998.
16. García Canclini N. Culturas Hibridas, estrategias para entrar y salir de la Modernidad: Editorial Grijalbo; 1990.
17. Thomas L. Antropología de la Muerte México: Fondo Cultural México; 1983.
18. Mbember A. Necropolitica España: ediciónes Melusina; 2011.
19. Herrera Diego, Hutchins F., Gaus D & Troya C.(2018): Intercultural health in Ecuador: an asymmetrical and incomplete project, Anthropology & Medicine
Copyright (c) 2021 Rural Family Practice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.