Medicine does not think

  • Diego Herrera Saludesa Ecuador
  • David Gaus Andean Health & Development
Keywords: evidence-based medicine, scientific skepticism, vaccines, philosophy of medicine

Abstract

This article explores the tension between technical-scientific and reflective thinking in medicine, analyzing how skepticism towards scientific evidence, especially regarding vaccines, reflects a deeper crisis in the relationship between medicine, politics and digital society

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Heidegger M. ¿Qué significa pensar? [Internet]. 2ª ed. Barcelona: Herder; 2018.
2. Nuwarda RF, Ramzan I, Weekes L, Kayser V. Vaccine Hesitancy: Contemporary Issues and Historical Background. Vaccines (Basel). 2022;10(10):1595. doi:10.3390/vaccines10101595.
3. Kennedy B, Tyson A. Americans' Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline. Pew Research Center. 2023. Disponible en: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/11/14/americans-trust-in-scientists-positive-views-of-science-continue-to-decline/.
4. Frieden T, Sebelius K, Lurie N, et al. 13 Questions Kennedy Must Answer, According to Experts. New York Times. 2025. Disponible en: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/opinion/rfk-jr-confirmation-hearing.html.
5. Frieden T, et al. NYT. 2025 Jan 28.
6. Han B-C. La sociedad de la transparencia. Barcelona: Herder; 2013.
7. Richards B. Why have authoritarianism and libertarianism merged? A political psychologist on 'the vulnerability of the modern self'. The Conversation. 2024.
Published
2025-03-31
How to Cite
1.
Herrera D, Gaus D. Medicine does not think. PFR [Internet]. 2025Mar.31 [cited 2025Apr.4];10(1). Available from: https://practicafamiliarrural.org/index.php/pfr/article/view/341

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>